|
The
Comitatus Ballista |
|
|
' |
|
|
|
Back in early 2005 the committee suggested we should invest in Roman
artillery. A very grown-up telephone poll showed the group massively backed the
proposal. It was felt that artillery would add a new dimension to shows, and
increase the public appetite for what we do. With no cities to
besiege, or a lorry for transport, we didn’t need an onager. We would bend
our efforts towards an iron framed ballista. And therein lies
a universe of discussion, argument and counter argument. A Greek
document “Heron’s Construction and Dimensions of the Cheiroballistra”
describes eight mechanical parts, each described with a coloured diagram.
Discovered in 1843, it was largely discredited until Dr. Eric Marsden
identified it in 1971 as a description of a bolt shooting catapult, with
metal frames and an arched strut, identical to those on Trajan’s column. The
introduction of such machines can be dated to the end of the 1st
century AD, and they are recorded as being in use 1,000 years later. But
there is more than one way of interpreting the document, and current
reconstructions vary in size, design and capacity. Various other writers can
be used to fill in some blanks, but there are issues around interpretation. |
|
|
Heron’s measurements produce a small hand portable machine. They are of relatively low poundage, but are viable weapons and could be the “hand shooters or scorpions” mentioned in Vegetius, with no stands or winches. However archaeological finds do suggest much larger measurements for some parts of the machine, Heron himself mentions winches in connection with torsion catapults, and the measurement given for the cross-section of the wooden case is 25% larger than for the old fashioned Vitruvian scorpio, suggesting the weapon is correspondingly more powerful. The new design allows the arms to move through a greater arc, by borrowing the palintone style frame used on stone throwing ballistae. But the spring frames are moved further apart giving greater power. Some have suggested the arms could swing inwards to increase the distance the arms travel and so generate more force. This is a 19th century idea, and some archaeological finds seem to support the theory. However it is hard to believe that much of this greater swing would not be wasted until the bolt is actually propelled forward. However some testers claim that this is a more efficient system. The jury is still out. |
|
|
Many reconstructions use a simple winch system to pull back the trigger mechanism. The ratchet and pawl system used on our example is one possible interpretation of the illustration on the “Cupid Gem”, a seal stone showing the only side view of a Roman catapult. It is an authentic, and importantly, a safe system, despite the 700lb plus draw weight. In the future it would be interesting to field different interpretations of the iron framed design. However for our first machine we followed the work of Alan Wilkins, and our machine was constructed by Len Morgan, a well respected Roman artisan. He was a gentleman throughout and his knowledge and expertise is second to none. There are relatively few compromises in our design, and the performance is excellent. The machine is easily repaired in the field. New arms and whole spring assemblies could be easily fitted into a broken machine. The arched strut allows for accurate aiming, but the bolt cannot hit the frame in transit as with earlier designs. |
|
|
Modern nylon rigging rope is used in the springs. We explain that it has
to be pre-stretched so when it is placed under tension no power is wasted. We
haven't painted or dyed the rope black to look more authentic, we want the
public to notice it. We need to explain how Romans used rope made from animal
sinew, which would have had better performance than our modern substitute.
But this is a working reconstruction of how things worked, we have had to
compromise with the rope, and we should not hide the fact. After seventeen months the iron framed ballista arrived on a hot July
day, just two days before the naming ceremony. The trials of pre-stretched
rope, of exploding moulds, and messing around with the size of the wooden
stand were left behind. After some quick tests on |
|
|
It was After several hours out in the heat and sun we formed up and marched
through the crowds to the Roman Baths public house,
and downstairs to the |
|
|
We had never done anything so formal before and it could have been a
flop. But the whole thing was just for us, presented by us. It was great. I
had a vague idea of what we should do, gave up trying to plan what we would
do, and just did and said what seemed right. Steve intoned Latin prayers on
one side, while Paul III and Jamie burnt incense on small portable altars.
The ballista was christened with wine, oil, wheat, blood and a popular nut
based snack. I don't know what I said, but it came from the heart. It was a
very special occasion. The ballista was named |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOME |
|